allaboutreviews

Petitioner had not been cleared due to bad family background and declared unsuitable for the post of Sub-Inspector by Agency and he was not for appointed as Sub-Inspector. High Court held that while making recruitment to any post including that of Sub-Inspectors only personal character of a candidate is relevant and he cannot be held liable/responsible for bad character/mis-deeds of any other member of his family. Viewing the case in hand even with reference to Islamic juris prudence, no one can be made responsible for mis-deeds of others. Writ Petition-Service-18642-18 YOUSAF SADIQUE VS GOP ETC 28-02-2020 2020 LHC 749 www.ilovepakistani.com

LOCUS STANDAI 2019 SCMR 1952 Arts. 184(3)---Constitutional jurisdiction under Art. 184(3) of the Constitution--- Writ of quo warranto---locus standi /"aggrieved person"---For issuance of a writ of quo warranto, person/petitioner laying information before Court need not be an aggrieved person. 2016 SCMR 1403 Inheritance mutation---Estoppel and abandonment of claim---Where any heir, who was directly affected by a wrongfully recorded mutation of inheritance, failed to challenge such mutation for a considerable length of time until his death, deprived his own heirs of the locus standi to dispute such mutation on the ground of his estoppel, abandonment of claim/cause of action. 2016 SCMR 679 S. 8---Declaration of property as evacuee trust property---Proof---Plea that there was no document on record showing that suit property had been attached to a charitable, religious or educational purposes---Validity---When preponderance of documentary as well as oral evidence on the re...

Citation Name : 2019 PL,C(CS) 1467 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Side Appellant SHABAZ 'INAL1 KHAN Side Opponent; GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ESTABLISHMENTOIVISION REGIONAL BOARD FEDERAL EMPLOYEES. S.372---Benevolent fund and group insurance of the deceased employee—Succession certificate,. issuance or---Only such benefits were inheritable which became receivable by the deceased during his lifetime Le_ payable lo the employee before his death—Service benefits are given  to the employee as grant/compensation En lieu or death and made payable to a nominee or family were not heritable and could not be treated as tarka .estate of the deceased--I3enevorent fund and group insurance could not be treated as heritable being specie of grant compensation  accrued after the death of an employee. Citation Name : 2O19 PLC! 1 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Side Appellant : MUFIAMMAD „PAVED Side Opponent : Mst. ROSHAN JAHAN Inneritance---"larka "--Scop-e--Employee benefits--General Provideri...